{"ID":5443870,"CreatedAt":"2026-07-01T02:07:11.383974684Z","UpdatedAt":"2026-07-03T16:35:57.158869329Z","DeletedAt":null,"paper_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31963","arxiv_id":"2606.31963","title":"Signed-Permutation Coordinate Transport for RMSNorm Transformers","abstract":"Modern LLM workflows move coordinate-indexed objects across checkpoints: steering vectors, sparse autoencoders, top-$k$ neuron sets, attribution lists, and merge alignments. This is only well posed after fixing the model's residual-stream gauge, which we show is architecture-dependent: LayerNorm residual charts have permutation gauge $S_d$ (up to a global sign flip), while RMSNorm charts with generic per-channel gain have signed-permutation gauge $B_d = S_d \\ltimes \\{\\pm 1\\}^d$. Permutation-only alignment is therefore symmetry-incomplete for RMSNorm models. We introduce sign-marginalized Hungarian matching and prove a sharp failure mode: with decorrelated coordinates, raw signed-correlation matching has a structural permutation-accuracy ceiling at the positive-sign fraction of the true gauge, which sign-marginalization removes. We then make coordinate-preserving transport, not function-level merging, the primary object: composing saved-checkpoint local $B_d$ gauges along same-base fine-tuning trajectories recovers 91.1% of cross-run coordinates at 1500 steps versus 60.3% for endpoint matching, and the gain is not explained by merely routing through the base. The recovered gauge transfers tools that permutation-only alignment breaks: TinyLlama SAE reconstruction has NMSE 0.004 under $B_d$ versus 1.08 under $S_d$; Qwen sentiment steering preserves 95.8% of its effect versus 17.2%; refusal steering reverses sign under $S_d$; coordinate-preserving merges behave the same way. The same covariance governs stateful training: signed transport of AdamW state preserves the resumed trajectory, while permutation-only state follows a different one from a functionally identical checkpoint. Finally, gauge-sweep audits show index-level interpretability claims are reproducible only relative to an explicit gauge.","short_abstract":"Modern LLM workflows move coordinate-indexed objects across checkpoints: steering vectors, sparse autoencoders, top-$k$ neuron sets, attribution lists, and merge alignments. This is only well posed after fixing the model's residual-stream gauge, which we show is architecture-dependent: LayerNorm residual charts have pe...","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31963","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.31963v1","authors":"[\"John Sweeney\"]","published":"2026-06-30T17:02:33Z","proceeding":"cs.LG","tasks":"[\"cs.LG\",\"cs.CL\",\"stat.ML\"]","methods":"[\"Transformer\",\"Large Language Model\"]","has_code":false}
