{"ID":3083770,"CreatedAt":"2026-06-05T06:46:15.197025399Z","UpdatedAt":"2026-06-07T03:54:17.966829144Z","DeletedAt":null,"paper_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06083","arxiv_id":"2606.06083","title":"The Dignity-Centric Stack: A Commons-Governed, Horizontally Federated Architecture for Human-Dignity AI","abstract":"The human-dignity-centric digital social contract grounds personal data in human dignity, data personalism, and data sovereignty, and articulates six dimensions of data governance: technological oversight, automation limits, economic justice, political legitimacy, social cohesion, and legal guarantees. It presupposes, however, that enforcement falls to State regulators, licensed fiduciaries, and multi-stakeholder bodies embedded in existing legal systems. This paper asks whether its normative content can instead be realized not as rules imposed on the owners of the AI stack from without, but as a commons-governed infrastructure that any person, firm, or State may use and fund while its governance stays horizontal, polycentric, and subsidiary. We construct the Dignity Stack, a six-layer architecture mapping each dimension onto a layer of commons-governed AI infrastructure, with protocols drawn from the Liberation Stack framework and from the cooperative, mutualist, and libertarian-municipalist traditions. The commons is State-agnostic rather than anti-State, anarchist in its horizontal means but not in the abolition of the State. Its central device is a decoupling of capital from control, by which the stack functions as a shared civic battery, charged by many contributors yet steered by none in proportion to its charge. We prove that this defeats formal capture through votes or surplus, and show that structural capture, the leverage of a dominant supplier free to withdraw what it provides, is resisted only insofar as operational supply is polycentric and substitutable, a condition demanding at the lower layers and perhaps presently unattainable at chip fabrication. We conclude, with explicit attention to its limits, that commons-governed AI realizes the values the contract proclaims more faithfully than the regulation it presupposes.","short_abstract":"The human-dignity-centric digital social contract grounds personal data in human dignity, data personalism, and data sovereignty, and articulates six dimensions of data governance: technological oversight, automation limits, economic justice, political legitimacy, social cohesion, and legal guarantees. It presupposes,...","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06083","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.06083v1","authors":"[\"Eduardo C. Garrido-Merchán\"]","published":"2026-06-04T12:21:07Z","proceeding":"cs.CY","tasks":"[\"cs.CY\"]","methods":"[]","has_code":false}