{"ID":2877918,"CreatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","UpdatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","DeletedAt":null,"paper_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19304","arxiv_id":"2508.19304","title":"Epistemic Trade-Off: An Analysis of the Operational Breakdown and Ontological Limits of \"Certainty-Scope\" in AI","abstract":"The recently published \"certainty-scope\" conjecture offers a compelling insight into the inherent trade-off present within artificial intelligence (AI) systems. As general research, this investigation remains vital as a philosophical undertaking and a potential guide for directing AI investments, design, and deployment, especially in safety-critical and mission-critical domains where risk levels are substantially elevated. While maintaining intellectual coherence, its formalization ultimately consolidates this insight into a suspended epistemic truth, which resists operational implementation within practical systems. This paper argues that the conjecture's objective to furnish insights for engineering design and regulatory decision-making is limited by two fundamental factors: first, its dependence on incomputable constructs and its failure to capture the generality factors of AI, rendering it practically unimplementable and unverifiable; second, its foundational ontological assumption of AI systems as self-contained epistemic entities, distancing it from the complex and dynamic socio-technical environments where knowledge is co-constructed. We conclude that this dual breakdown - an epistemic closure deficit and an embeddedness bypass - hinders the conjecture's transition to a practical and actionable framework suitable for informing and guiding AI deployments. In response, we point towards a possible framing of the epistemic challenge, emphasizing the inherent epistemic burdens of AI within complex human-centric domains.","short_abstract":"The recently published \"certainty-scope\" conjecture offers a compelling insight into the inherent trade-off present within artificial intelligence (AI) systems. As general research, this investigation remains vital as a philosophical undertaking and a potential guide for directing AI investments, design, and deployment...","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19304","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.19304v2","authors":"[\"Generoso Immediato\"]","published":"2025-08-26T05:47:21Z","proceeding":"cs.CY","tasks":"[\"cs.CY\",\"cs.AI\",\"cs.CE\"]","methods":"[]","has_code":false}