{"ID":2872537,"CreatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","UpdatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","DeletedAt":null,"paper_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08449","arxiv_id":"2509.08449","title":"DSFL: A Dual-Server Byzantine-Resilient Federated Learning Framework via Group-Based Secure Aggregation","abstract":"Federated Learning (FL) enables decentralized model training without sharing raw data, offering strong privacy guarantees. However, existing FL protocols struggle to defend against Byzantine participants, maintain model utility under non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data, and remain lightweight for edge devices. Prior work either assumes trusted hardware, uses expensive cryptographic tools, or fails to address privacy and robustness simultaneously. We propose DSFL, a Dual-Server Byzantine-Resilient Federated Learning framework that addresses these limitations using a group-based secure aggregation approach. Unlike LSFL, which assumes non-colluding semi-honest servers, DSFL removes this dependency by revealing a key vulnerability: privacy leakage through client-server collusion. DSFL introduces three key innovations: (1) a dual-server secure aggregation protocol that protects updates without encryption or key exchange, (2) a group-wise credit-based filtering mechanism to isolate Byzantine clients based on deviation scores, and (3) a dynamic reward-penalty system for enforcing fair participation. DSFL is evaluated on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 under up to 30 percent Byzantine participants in both IID and non-IID settings. It consistently outperforms existing baselines, including LSFL, homomorphic encryption methods, and differential privacy approaches. For example, DSFL achieves 97.15 percent accuracy on CIFAR-10 and 68.60 percent on CIFAR-100, while FedAvg drops to 9.39 percent under similar threats. DSFL remains lightweight, requiring only 55.9 ms runtime and 1088 KB communication per round.","short_abstract":"Federated Learning (FL) enables decentralized model training without sharing raw data, offering strong privacy guarantees. However, existing FL protocols struggle to defend against Byzantine participants, maintain model utility under non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data, and remain lightweight for...","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08449","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.08449v1","authors":"[\"Charuka Herath\",\"Yogachandran Rahulamathavan\",\"Varuna De Silva\",\"Sangarapillai Lambotharan\"]","published":"2025-09-10T09:47:51Z","proceeding":"cs.CR","tasks":"[\"cs.CR\",\"cs.AI\",\"cs.DC\"]","methods":"[]","has_code":false}