{"ID":2862518,"CreatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","UpdatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","DeletedAt":null,"paper_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25781","arxiv_id":"2509.25781","title":"Deontic Argumentation","abstract":"We address the issue of defining a semantics for deontic argumentation that supports weak permission. Some recent results show that grounded semantics do not support weak permission when there is a conflict between two obligations. We provide a definition of Deontic Argumentation Theory that accounts for weak permission, and we recall the result about grounded semantics. Then, we propose a new semantics that supports weak permission.","short_abstract":"We address the issue of defining a semantics for deontic argumentation that supports weak permission. Some recent results show that grounded semantics do not support weak permission when there is a conflict between two obligations. We provide a definition of Deontic Argumentation Theory that accounts for weak permissio...","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25781","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.25781v2","authors":"[\"Guido Governatori\",\"Antonino Rotolo\"]","published":"2025-09-30T04:50:07Z","proceeding":"cs.AI","tasks":"[\"cs.AI\",\"cs.LO\"]","methods":"[]","has_code":false}