{"ID":2858745,"CreatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","UpdatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","DeletedAt":null,"paper_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06953","arxiv_id":"2510.06953","title":"Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesis in LLM Reasoning","abstract":"The Uniform Information Density (UID) hypothesis proposes that effective communication is achieved by maintaining a stable flow of information. In this work, we revisit this principle in the context of Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning, asking whether step-level uniformity reflects reasoning quality. To this end, we introduce a novel framework to quantify uniformity of information flow at both local and global levels, using an entropy-based stepwise density metric. Across experiments on seven reasoning benchmarks, we see a counter-intuitive pattern: while high-quality reasoning exhibit smooth step-by-step transitions local uniformity and structured, non-uniform information flow at the trajectory level global non-uniformity. The results demonstrate that these uniformities outperform alternative internal signals as predictors of reasoning quality, and such divergence with human communication is not a model deficiency, but a byproduct of distinct objectives between human communication and LLM reasoning.","short_abstract":"The Uniform Information Density (UID) hypothesis proposes that effective communication is achieved by maintaining a stable flow of information. In this work, we revisit this principle in the context of Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning, asking whether step-level uniformity reflects reasoning quality. To this end, we...","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06953","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.06953v3","authors":"[\"Minju Gwak\",\"Guijin Son\",\"Jaehyung Kim\"]","published":"2025-10-08T12:37:04Z","proceeding":"cs.AI","tasks":"[\"cs.AI\",\"cs.CL\"]","methods":"[\"Large Language Model\",\"Language Model\"]","has_code":false}
