{"ID":2844115,"CreatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","UpdatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","DeletedAt":null,"paper_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07364","arxiv_id":"2511.07364","title":"Self-Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Step Tasks: Stepwise Confidence Estimation for Failure Detection","abstract":"Reliability and failure detection of large language models (LLMs) is critical for their deployment in high-stakes, multi-step reasoning tasks. Prior work explores confidence estimation for self-evaluating LLM-scorer systems, with confidence scorers estimating the likelihood of errors in LLM responses. However, most methods focus on single-step outputs and overlook the challenges of multi-step reasoning. In this work, we extend self-evaluation techniques to multi-step tasks, testing two intuitive approaches: holistic scoring and step-by-step scoring. Using two multi-step benchmark datasets, we show that stepwise evaluation generally outperforms holistic scoring in detecting potential errors, with up to 15% relative increase in AUC-ROC. Our findings demonstrate that self-evaluating LLM systems provide meaningful confidence estimates in complex reasoning, improving their trustworthiness and providing a practical framework for failure detection.","short_abstract":"Reliability and failure detection of large language models (LLMs) is critical for their deployment in high-stakes, multi-step reasoning tasks. Prior work explores confidence estimation for self-evaluating LLM-scorer systems, with confidence scorers estimating the likelihood of errors in LLM responses. However, most met...","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07364","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.07364v1","authors":"[\"Vaibhav Mavi\",\"Shubh Jaroria\",\"Weiqi Sun\"]","published":"2025-11-10T18:19:51Z","proceeding":"cs.LG","tasks":"[\"cs.LG\",\"cs.AI\",\"cs.CL\"]","methods":"[\"Large Language Model\",\"Language Model\"]","has_code":false}