{"ID":2842883,"CreatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","UpdatedAt":"2026-06-01T04:54:23.091178241Z","DeletedAt":null,"paper_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09600","arxiv_id":"2511.09600","title":"Cogent argument extensions are weakly admissible but not vice versa","abstract":"In this research note, we show the relationship between two non-admissible argumentation framework semantics: cogent and weakly admissible semantics. We prove that, while cogent extensions are weakly admissible, the converse is not true.","short_abstract":"In this research note, we show the relationship between two non-admissible argumentation framework semantics: cogent and weakly admissible semantics. We prove that, while cogent extensions are weakly admissible, the converse is not true.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09600","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.09600v1","authors":"[\"Gustavo Bodanza\"]","published":"2025-11-12T15:26:57Z","proceeding":"cs.AI","tasks":"[\"cs.AI\",\"cs.LO\"]","methods":"[]","has_code":false}