{"ID":23475235,"CreatedAt":"2026-09-18T01:09:05.407443952Z","UpdatedAt":"2026-09-20T18:11:56.143995915Z","DeletedAt":null,"paper_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20106","arxiv_id":"2609.20106","title":"AnyviewMeter: Adapting Robotic Reward Models with Camera Geometry and Multi-View Attention","abstract":"Robotic reward models evaluate task execution from visual observations, but their predictions can change with camera viewpoint and occlusion even when the underlying task state is unchanged. Adapting a pretrained reward model to a local task therefore requires accounting for how that task is observed. We introduce AnyviewMeter, a geometry-conditioned adaptation framework for robotic reward models that represent task progress as a scalar reward signal. It combines low-rank fine-tuning with token-aligned Plucker rays and synchronous block attention: ray conditioning incorporates camera geometry into visual features and attention queries and keys, while block attention fuses synchronized views inside the pretrained decoder. The framework supports both single-view reward prediction and joint multi-view evaluation through parameter-efficient adaptation of a pretrained Robometer model. On PickCube, single-view adaptation improves progress prediction in every camera group and reduces mean absolute error under a changed field of view by approximately 21% relative to RGB fine-tuning. Across simulated manipulation tasks, joint multi-view prediction reduces progress error by 41-69% compared with averaging single-view RGB predictions and improves temporal ordering in approximately 88% of task-camera groups. On real tasks with fixed and wrist-mounted cameras, mean absolute error decreases by approximately 21% relative to averaged RGB fine-tuning. These results support camera geometry and joint visual evidence as useful components of task-specific robotic reward adaptation.","short_abstract":"Robotic reward models evaluate task execution from visual observations, but their predictions can change with camera viewpoint and occlusion even when the underlying task state is unchanged. Adapting a pretrained reward model to a local task therefore requires accounting for how that task is observed. We introduce Anyv...","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20106","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.20106v1","authors":"[\"Yuang Tu\",\"Runjia Tan\",\"Yujie Yan\",\"Jinghan Hu\",\"Chen Lv\"]","published":"2026-09-17T12:07:22Z","proceeding":"cs.CV","tasks":"[\"cs.CV\"]","methods":"[]","has_code":false}
