{"ID":23475200,"CreatedAt":"2026-09-18T01:09:05.407443952Z","UpdatedAt":"2026-09-20T18:11:56.143995915Z","DeletedAt":null,"paper_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20050","arxiv_id":"2609.20050","title":"The Missing Complement: State-Conditioned Minimal Sufficient Evidence for Coding Agents","abstract":"A coding agent halfway through an issue has already read much of what a retriever ranks highest. Relevance is scored per passage, but sufficiency belongs to the set: a ranker can fill its budget with variants of one required fact and leave the decision unsupported. We formulate state-conditioned minimal sufficient evidence recovery: given a captured agent state, recover a compact evidence combination that supplies the support its next decision still lacks. SERBench measures this on 500 held-out states from 45 repositories, recording what the agent has seen and crediting only sets that cover every fact the current decision was annotated to require. MSS-Complement treats acquisition as set construction, not ranking. Three semantic calls propose a jointly sufficient set, search for what it lacks, and return 4-8 intact source units within 6,144 tokens. One configuration, fixed on calibration data, recovers a complete set for 73.0% of those states at five items and 80.6% at eight, against 61.4% and 72.4% for Qwen3 embedding with reranking. A matched control ranking by similarity alone reaches 66.6%, placing the gain in the set-level policy, not the computation. From frozen repository source with no gold-derived pool, the lead is 5.0 points. On AMA-Bench it answers from a 76.2% smaller answer prompt, with accuracy 2.08 points above that benchmark's own memory agent. Removing one required group from an otherwise complete set costs 12.3 and 11.1 points of repair-localization precision under two executors. Retrieval for agents is better posed as recovering what a decision lacks than re-ranking what an issue resembles.","short_abstract":"A coding agent halfway through an issue has already read much of what a retriever ranks highest. Relevance is scored per passage, but sufficiency belongs to the set: a ranker can fill its budget with variants of one required fact and leave the decision unsupported. We formulate state-conditioned minimal sufficient evid...","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20050","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.20050v1","authors":"[\"Zhexi Feng\",\"Ruiyi Zhang\",\"Yongbo Yang\",\"Pengtao Xie\"]","published":"2026-09-17T10:56:47Z","proceeding":"cs.IR","tasks":"[\"cs.IR\",\"cs.AI\",\"cs.CL\"]","methods":"[]","has_code":false}